Patient activation and psychological coping strategies to manage challenging circumstances during the COVID-19 pandemic in people with kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Coping with health problems requires some degree of self-management; however, an individual's ability to self-manage can be threatened during challenging times, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Exploring differences and changes in psychological well-being and coping strategies between those with low and high patient activation may inform appropriate interventions to support psychological coping. METHODS: People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (non-dialysis and transplant) were recruited from 11 hospital sites across England between August and December 2020. Participants responded to an online survey study, including the Brief Coping Orientation to Problem Experienced (COPE) Inventory, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), Short Health Anxiety Index (SHAI), and Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13). A follow-up survey was conducted 6-9 months later. Paired t tests assessed within-group changes, and chi-squared tests compared coping strategies utilised by low- and high-activated participants. General linear modelling was performed to determine the relationship between patient activation and coping strategies, and covariates. RESULTS: Two hundred and fourteen participants were recruited (mean age: 60.7, 51% male, mean eGFR: 38.9 ml/min/1.73 m2). Low-activated participants were significantly more anxious than high-activated participants (P = 0.045). Health anxiety significantly decreased (i.e., got better) for high-activated participants (P = 0.016). Higher patient activation scores were associated with greater use of problem-focused strategies (ß = 0.288, P < 0.001). Age (ß = - 0.174, P = 0.012), sex (ß = 0.188, P = 0.004), and education level (ß = 0.159, P = 0.019) significantly predicted use of problem-focused strategies. DISCUSSION: Those with higher activation had lower levels of anxiety, and more frequently used adaptive coping strategies during the pandemic. Targeted support and interventions may be required for people with CKD to enhance patient activation, encourage more positive adaptive coping strategies, and mitigate maladaptive coping strategies.

Positive Psychology Interventions for Improving Self-management Behaviors in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: a Narrative Review of Current Evidence.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Interests have been emerging in using positive psychology interventions (PPIs) to improve diabetes self-management (DSM) behaviors (e.g., blood glucose monitoring, physical activity). To explore the impact of those interventions on DSM behaviors, we summarized the evidence of PPIs on self-management behaviors among both type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients between 2012 and 2022. RECENT FINDINGS: Among the eight studies identified, different study designs and types of PPIs were apparent. Typical PPIs (e.g., activities enhancing positive affect/gratitude/self-affirmation/optimism) were usually applied to T1D patients (N = 5); PPIs were usually combined with motivational interviewing for T2D patients (N = 3). Contrary to expectations, PPIs did not consistently demonstrate positive effects on self-management behaviors' change regardless of the types of diabetes patients, compared to the control groups. Improvements in diabetes patients' self-management behaviors from PPIs are still unclear. Future studies should more rigorously evaluate and identify the active ingredients of PPIs for behavioral changes among diabetes patients.

An investigation of stigma and self-management in individuals diagnosed with epilepsy.

AIM: The complex nature of epilepsy disease confronts individuals with difficulties such as stigma. Stigma has a negative impact, particularly on individuals' coping with the disease. It is important for individuals diagnosed with epilepsy to adopt many self-management behaviors so that they can control these situations. This study aims to measure the stigma and self-management levels of individuals diagnosed with epilepsy and determine the relationship between stigma and self-management. METHODS: This descriptive and associational study was conducted in the Neurology Outpatient Clinic of a Training and Research Hospital and 295 patients were included in the sample based on various inclusion criteria such as having a diagnosis of epilepsy for at least six months and not having any psychiatric disorder that would prevent reading and comprehension. Data were collected through the Descriptive Information Form, the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy, and the Epilepsy Self-Management Scale. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Standard Concurrent User V 26 statistical package program. FINDINGS: The Stigma Scale of Epilepsy total mean score was found 60.62 ± 15.40 in individuals diagnosed with epilepsy. The mean scores for the sub-scales were found 7.08 ± 2.20 for the false beliefs sub-scale, 18.86 ± 4.97 for the discrimination sub-scale, 21.64 ± 7.07 for the social isolation sub-scale, 8.46 ± 3.18 for the inadequacy sub-scale, and 5.45 ± 1.41 for the stigma resistance sub-scale. The ESMS total mean score of individuals diagnosed with epilepsy was found to be 140.54 ± 15.33. The mean scores for the ESMS sub-scales were 44.76 ± 4.29 for the medicine management sub-scale, 20.29 ± 5.98 for the information management sub-scale, 30.49 ± 4.80 for the safety management sub-scale, 23.95 ± 4.34 for the seizure management sub-scale, and 21.02 ± 4.65 for lifestyle management sub-scale. A significant and negative relationship was found between the Epilepsy Self-Management Scale (ESMS) and the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy. CONCLUSION: This study found that individuals experienced a moderate level of stigma and had high levels of self-management. Stigma was found to decrease with the increase in the self-management level. In this regard, it is recommended to conduct intervention studies to increase self-management levels and reduce stigma for individuals diagnosed with epilepsy.

Can co-created knowledge mobilisation interventions alter and enhance mindlines to improve childhood eczema care? A UK-based Social Impact Framework evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of using knowledge mobilisation interventions to alter and enhance mindlines and improve childhood eczema care. DESIGN: The eczema mindlines study involved three stages: (1) mapping and confirming eczema mindlines, (2) intervention development and delivery and (3) analysis of intervention impact. The focus of this paper is on stage 3. Data analysis was guided by the Social Impact Framework to address the questions: (1) what is the impact of this study on individuals and groups? (2) what changes in behaviour and practice have occurred due to their involvement? (3) what mechanisms have enabled these impacts or changes to occur? and (4) what are the recommendations and questions arising from this research? SETTINGS: A deprived inner-city neighbourhood in central England and national/international settings. PARTICIPANTS: Patients, practitioners and wider community members exposed to the interventions locally, nationally and internationally. RESULTS: Data revealed tangible multi-level, relational and intellectual impacts. Mechanisms supporting impact included: simplicity and consistency of messages adapted to audience, flexibility, opportunism and perseverance, personal interconnectivity and acknowledgement of emotion. Co-created knowledge mobilisation strategies to alter and enhance mindlines mediated through knowledge brokering were effective in producing tangible changes in eczema care practice and self-management and in 'mainstreaming' childhood eczema in positive way across communities. These changes cannot be directly attributed to the knowledge mobilisation interventions, however, the evidence points to the significant contribution made. CONCLUSION: Co-created knowledge mobilisation interventions offer a valuable method of altering and enhancing eczema mindlines across lay-practitioner-wider society boundaries. The Social Impact Framework provides comprehensive method of understanding and documenting the complex web of impact occurring as a result of knowledge mobilisation. This approach is transferable to managing other long-term conditions.

Predictors of Self-Management Behaviors After Discharge Among Unplanned Dialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with unplanned dialysis must perform self-management behaviors to maintain their health in the community after discharge. Understanding the factors that predict the postdischarge self-management behaviors of patients with unplanned dialysis can assist nurses to implement appropriate discharge plans for this population. PURPOSE: This study was designed to predict the effects of uncertainty in illness, self-care knowledge, and social-support-related needs during hospitalization on the self-management behaviors of patients with unplanned dialysis during their first 3 months after discharge from the hospital. METHODS: One hundred sixty-nine patients with unplanned dialysis from the nephrology department of a medical center in Taiwan were enrolled in this prospective study using convenience sampling. At hospital admission, demographic, uncertainty in illness, self-care knowledge, and social support information was collected using a structured questionnaire. Information on self-management behavior was collected at 3 months postdischarge when the patients visited outpatient clinics. RESULTS: Hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that self-care knowledge, uncertainty in illness, and social support were important predictors of self-management behaviors at 3 months postdischarge, explaining 65.6% of the total variance in self-management behaviors. Social support increased the variance in self-management behaviors by 27.9%. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Comprehensive discharge planning to improve the postdischarge self-management behaviors of patients with unplanned dialysis should involve interventions to improve self-care knowledge, reduce uncertainty in illness, and increase social support. Building social support should be given priority attention.

Mediating Role of Hope Between Social Support and Self-Management Among Chinese Liver Transplant Recipients: A Multi-Center Cross-Sectional Study.

This study aimed to investigate the common status of self-management in liver transplant recipients and to explore the mediating role of hope in the relationship between social support and self-management. Two hundred and ten liver transplant recipients from two tertiary hospitals were included. Questionnaires were used for general demographic information, the Perceived Social Support Scale, the Herth Hope Index, and the Self-Management Questionnaire for Liver Transplantation Recipients. Lifestyle management of liver transplant recipients was good, while the communication with physicians, cognitive symptom management, and exercise dimensions were less than satisfactory. Minimal assurance of family and education levels were significantly associated with self-management. Social support was positively correlated with self-management and hope (r = .31, p < .01; r = .40, p < .01). Hope was positively correlated with self-management (r = .39, p < .01). Additionally, the effect of social support on self-management was partially mediated (ß = .17, p < .01) by hope. The proportion of mediation of hope was 40.09%. Therefore, well-designed interventions that boost both social support and hope may help improve self-management behavior in liver transplant recipients.

Individualized care for older adults with diabetes and its relationship with communication, psychosocial self-efficacy, resources and support for self-management and socio-demographics.

AIM: To examine the relationship between patient-provider communication, psychosocial patient self-efficacy, resources and support for self-management and socio-demographics within individualized care of older adults with diabetes. DESIGN: A quantitative study with a cross-sectional survey design. METHODS: Data were collected from September 2019 to January 2021 using: Individualized Care Scale, The Communication Assessment Tool, The Diabetes Empowerment Scale and The Resources and Support for Self-Management Scale. Patients with either Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus that were 65 years old and over (N = 145) participated in the study. RESULTS: The most positive aspects of patient-provider communication were respect and creating a comfortable environment for the patient. A significant relationship was observed between patients' perceptions and support of individualized care and diabetes-related measures. Effective communication was the main factor associated with support for individualizing care, and together with education level, empowerment and access to resources, explained 23% of the variance.

Why patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder start, continue or discontinue health-related apps supporting their self-management.

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE SUBJECT?: Self-management is essential in the treatment of those who have bipolar disorder. There are many apps to support self-management, but we know that these apps only sometimes cover the users' needs. WHAT IS ADDED TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: In our research, we made an inventory of apps that people with bipolar disorder use to cover their needs in self-management. We also have searched for the reasons to start, continue, switch or quit the use of those apps. We found that 44% (n = 18) of our respondents use health-related apps for self-management purposes. Apps for physical activity, planning and structure and apps for relaxation were most used. In the use of apps, the "freedom of choice" and user-friendliness are the most important in continuing the use of apps, while malfunctioning and "not fitting in individual needs" the main reasons were for quitting the use of apps. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Various apps can be used for self-management purposes as long as these apps meet the individual user's requirements. Clinicians and patients should have a broad view when looking for suitable apps and not limit the search to just professional apps. In developing new apps, patients, clinicians and developers should collaborate in the development process, requirements and design. ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Self-management is one of the cornerstones in the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD). Complementing interventions by apps are seen as a good opportunity to support self-management. However, there is insufficient knowledge about understanding the use of health-related applications by consumers with BD for self-management purposes. AIM: The study aims to gain insight from patients diagnosed with BD about reasons to use, continue or discontinue health-related apps. METHOD: This study employed a mixed-method design in which 41 participants diagnosed with BD participated in a quantitative survey, and 11 participants also participated in an in-depth interview. RESULTS: The survey showed that 44% (n = 18) of the participants use health-related apps, and 26.8% (n = 11) use those apps consistently. Interviews revealed that adjustability, usability, trustworthiness and the guarantee of privacy were the main reasons determining whether participants used or terminated the use of a health-related app. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Although we found that a substantial number of patients diagnosed with BD use one or more apps to support self-management, their use is often discontinued due to content that needs more robust to address their needs. Besides appropriate content, tailoring and persuasive technologies will likely promote the continued use of an app for self-management purposes. Cooperation between those diagnosed with bipolar disorder and health professionals (like mental health nurses) in developing and designing applications that are aimed to support self-management in BD is necessary for successful implementation and adaptation.

Construção, evidências de validade e normatização de uma escala de competências socioemocionais / Construction, evidence of validity and standardization of a scale of socio-emotional competences

As competências socioemocionais têm despertado a atenção de pesquisadores pela sua relevância teórica e aplicabilidade. O objetivo principal desta pesquisa foi a construção, busca de evidências de validade eprodução de normas para uma escala de competências socioemocionais. Foram realizados dois estudos com um total de 696 participantes. O primeiro estudo consistiu na elaboração de itens, análise de juízes e análise fatorial exploratória do instrumento. O segundo estudo consistiu na realização da análise fatorial confirmatória e produção de normas para fins de diagnóstico. Os resultados exploratórios apresentaram um instrumento inicial com 28 itens. Esta análise revelou cinco fatores que apresentaram agrupamentos de itens teoricamente consistentes com as definições do modelo hipotético utilizado. A análise fatorial confirmatória apresentou um modelo com bons índices de ajustes e com os mesmos fatorese itens encontrados na análise exploratória. Concluiu-se que a escala apresentou boas propriedades psicométricas(AU)

The socio-emotional competencies have attracted the attention of researchers due to their theoretical relevance and applicability. The main objective of this research was to build, search for evidence of validity and production of norms for a scale of socio-emotional competencies. Foram carried out two studies with atotal of 696 subjects. The first study consisted of the elaboration of items, analysis by judges and exploratory factor analysis of the instrument. The second study consisted of carrying out confirmatory factor analysis and producing norms for diagnostic purposes. The exploratory results presented an initial instrument with 28 items. This analysis revealed five factors that presented clusters of items theoretically consistent with the definitions of the hypothetical model used. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed a model with good fit indices and the same factors and items found in the exploratory analysis. It was concluded that the scale presented good psychometric properties(AU)

People with Parkinson's perspectives and experiences of self-management: Qualitative findings from a UK study.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's prevalence is growing, and more people are being impacted by the condition than ever before. Self-management has been proposed as one way to enable people living with the condition to improve or maintain their quality of life and wellbeing whilst living at home. AIM: To explore the views and experiences of how people living with Parkinson's self-manage their condition and identify areas needed to be incorporated into self-management resources or interventions. METHOD: Twenty people with Parkinson's from across London and Hertfordshire, UK took part in semi-structured interviews on self-management. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis to identify themes. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified: (1) Management of physical symptoms, which included engaging in physical activities, adapting their lifestyles, managing medication and using e-health resources; (2) Management of emotional impact, which involved using a range of cognitive and practical strategies, and seeking talking therapies and medication; and (3) barriers to self-management such as accessing accurate information, experiencing stigma towards their condition which impacted their self-esteem and identity, in turn impacting on their ability to self-manage. CONCLUSION: Holistic and person-centred self-management programmes or interventions should be developed incorporating components such as medication and emotional support, individualised planning of exercise regimes, and accessible, timely and accurate information. Furthermore, more public health knowledge on Parkinson's is needed to help reduce stigma.

Understanding Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management in Racial/Ethnic Minorities: Application of the Extended Parallel Processing Model and Sensemaking Theory in a Qualitative Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to understand the role of perceived disease threat and self-efficacy in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients' self-management by using the extended parallel processing model (EPPM) and sensemaking theory. METHODS: Semistructured interviews (n = 25) were conducted with T2DM patients from an urban safety-net hospital. Participants were 50% male/female median age was 55 years and 76% were Black. Participants were categorized by EPPM group based on validated questionnaires (high/low disease threat [HT/LT]; high/low self-efficacy [HE/LE]). Nine were HT/HE, 7 HT/LE, 6 LT/HE, and 3 LT/LE. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using inductive and deductive coding. Sensemaking theory was applied to contextualize and analyze data. RESULTS: Those with HT indicated threat fluctuated throughout diagnosis but that certain triggers (eg, diabetic complications) drove changes in disease view. Those in the HT/HE group more frequently expressed disease acceptance, whereas the HT/LE group more often expressed anger or denial. HT/HE participants expressed having adequate social support and higher trust in health care providers. HT/LE participants reported limited problem-solving skills. In those with LT, the HE group took more ownership of self-management behaviors. The LT/LE group had heightened positive and negative emotional responses that appeared to limit their ability to perform self-care. They also less frequently described problem-solving skills, instead expressing reliance on medical guidance from their providers. CONCLUSIONS: EPPM and sensemaking theory are effective frameworks for understanding how perceived health threat and self-efficacy may impede T2DM self-care. A greater focus on these constructs is needed to improve care among low-income minority patients, especially those with low threat and self-efficacy.

A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: With increasing restrictions on abortion across the United States, we sought to understand whether people seeking abortion would consider ending their pregnancy on their own if unable to access a facility-based abortion. METHODS: From January to June 2019, we surveyed patients seeking abortion at 4 facilities in 3 US states. We explored consideration of self-managed abortion (SMA) using responses to the question: "Would you consider ending this pregnancy on your own if you are unable to obtain care at a health care facility?" We used multivariable Poisson regression to assess associations between individual sociodemographic, pregnancy and care-seeking characteristics and prevalence of considering SMA. In bivariate Poisson models, we also explored whether consideration of SMA differed by specific obstacles to abortion care. RESULTS: One-third (34%) of 741 participants indicated they would definitely or probably consider ending the pregnancy on their own if unable to obtain care at a facility. Consideration of SMA was higher among those who reported no health insurance (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.66; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.12-2.44), described the pregnancy as unintended (aPR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.08-2.16), were seeking abortion due to concerns about their own physical or mental health (aPR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.02, 2.20), or experienced obstacles that delayed their abortion care seeking (aPR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.49, 3.40). Compared to those who would not consider SMA, participants who would consider SMA expressed higher difficulty finding an abortion facility (35 vs. 27%, p = 0.019), figuring out how to get to the clinic (29 vs 21%, p = 0.021) and needing multiple clinic visits (23 vs 17%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: One in three people seeking facility-based abortion would consider SMA if unable to obtain abortion care at a facility. As abortion access becomes increasingly restricted in the US, SMA may become more common. Future research should continue to monitor people's consideration and use of SMA and ensure that they have access to safe and effective methods.

Health literacy, illness perception, depression, and self-management among African Americans with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) causes significant morbidity and mortality. Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, African Americans are more likely to suffer and die from T2DM. PURPOSE: This study examines the associations between health literacy, illness perception, depression, working memory, executive function, and self-management among African Americans (18-65 years) with T2DM. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive cross-sectional design was used. Data were collected through Research Electronic Data Capture and transferred to the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 26 for statistical analysis. Fifty-three participants met study eligibility criteria. RESULTS: Health literacy was associated with depression ( r = -0.433, p = .003), more concerns about illness ( r = -0.357, p = .02), and better medication adherence ( r = 0.487, p = .001). Higher levels of depression were inversely associated with medication adherence ( r = -0.449, p = .002; r = 0.449, p = .003). Higher concern about illness was associated with lower medication adherence ( r = -0.414, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Lower health literacy coupled with illness perception and depression is associated with lower self-management behaviors among African Americans which can lead to complications of T2DM. More studies are needed to examine the association of cognitive factors with self-management activities among African Americans with T2DM. IMPLICATIONS: Limited health literacy is associated with lower medication adherence among African Americans with T2DM. Illness perception is a significant factor that influences self-management of T2DM among African Americans. Using screening tools that assess health literacy and illness perception may address underlying concerns regarding adherence to T2DM treatment regimens in African Americans.

Reduction of the Adult Epilepsy Self-Management Measure Instrument (AESMMI).

Managing one's own symptoms, medications, treatments, lifestyle, and psychological and social aspects of chronic disease is known as self-management. The Institute of Medicine has identified three categories of epilepsy self-management, including medication management, behavior management, and emotional support. Overall, there has been limited research of interventions measuring epilepsy self-management behaviors. The present study aimed to develop an abbreviated version of the full, previously published, Adult Epilepsy Self-Management Measurement Instrument (AESMMI) using confirmatory factor analysis. Data come from a cross-sectional survey of people with epilepsy. The sample included adults with epilepsy (n = 422), who reported that a clinician diagnosed them with epilepsy or a seizure disorder. We ran confirmatory factor analyses in testing the abbreviated scale. The scale was reduced using a theory-driven data-informed approach. The full AESMMI length was reduced by 40% (from 65 to 38 items) with an overall internal consistency of 0.912. The abbreviated AESMMI retained the 11 subdomains, with Cronbach's alphas from 0.535 to 0.878. This reduced item scale can be useful for assessing self-management behaviors for people with epilepsy or measuring outcomes in self-management research.

Exploring supportive care and information needs through a proposed eHealth application among melanoma patients undergoing systemic therapy: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: During and after systemic therapy, patients with high risk and advanced melanoma experience challenges regarding cancer-related symptoms, treatment-related adverse events, and an impact of these symptoms on their physical and psychosocial well-being. Few studies have investigated the specific needs of these patients and the potential role of eHealth applications in meeting those needs. OBJECTIVE: To explore the supportive care and information needs of high risk and advanced melanoma patients, and how these needs can be supported by eHealth applications. METHODS: In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews with high risk and advanced melanoma patients during or after systemic treatment were conducted to understand their needs and requirements as possible end-users of mobile eHealth applications. Interview transcripts were independently coded and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Thirteen participants consented to be interviewed, aged 31 to 71 years. Nearly all patients (n = 12, 92%) experienced unmet information and supportive care needs during and after active treatment. Patients expected to value eHealth applications that facilitate information gathering, wellbeing interventions, and symptom management. The majority of patients (n = 10, 77%) anticipated various advantages from using an eHealth application, including increased autonomy, higher quality of life, and improved disease self-management. DISCUSSION: High risk and advanced melanoma patients have unmet supportive care and information needs during and after systemic treatment. The use of eHealth applications might be an effective way to meet these unmet needs. Patients anticipate a variety of advantages from using these applications, including deriving various benefits from the use of these applications, such as enhanced autonomy.

Changes in Self-management During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

The COVID-19 pandemic affected how adults with diabetes perform self-management, and impacts may be greater among vulnerable populations. We assessed the impact of the pandemic on diabetes self-management among adults with type 2 diabetes at a Federally Qualified Health Center. Participants were surveyed by phone in Spanish and English from July to October of 2020. Most respondents (74%) were Latino and preferred to speak Spanish, with mean age of 54 years and mean HbA1c of 9.2%. Fifty-three percent reported less physical activity during the pandemic. While 43% had more difficulty obtaining healthy food, 38% reported eating more healthfully. Sixty-one percent had increased difficulty accessing medical care. Many felt more socially isolated (49%) and stressed (51%). Changes in diabetes self-management were both positive and negative for majority Latino patients in this low-resource community, which may require tailored approaches to mitigate negative impacts of the pandemic on physical and mental health.

Neural Processing of Health Information and Hypertension Self-Management in African Americans.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) rates are persistently high among African Americans with hypertension. Although self-management is critical to controlling BP, little is known about the brain-behavior connections underlying the processing of health information and the performance of self-management activities. OBJECTIVES: In this pilot study, we explored the associations among neural processing of two types of health information and a set of self-management cognitive processes (self-efficacy, activation, decision-making, and hypertension knowledge) and behaviors (physical activity, dietary intake, and medication taking) and health status indicators (BP, health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression). METHODS: Using a descriptive cross-sectional design, 16 African Americans with uncontrolled hypertension (mean age = 57.5 years, 68.8% women) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess activation of two neural networks, the task-positive network and the default mode network, and a region in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex associated with emotion-focused and analytic-focused health information. Participants completed self-reports and clinical assessments of self-management processes, behaviors, and health status indicators. RESULTS: Our hypothesis that neural processing associated with different types of health information would correlate with self-management cognitive processes and behaviors and health status indicators was only partially supported. Home diastolic BP was positively associated with ventromedial prefrontal cortex activation ( r = .536, p = .09); no other associations were found among the neural markers and self-management or health status variables. Expected relationships were found among the self-management processes and behaviors and health status indicators. DISCUSSION: To advance our understanding of the neural processes underlying health information processing and chronic illness self-management, future studies are needed that use larger samples with more heterogeneous populations and additional neuroimaging techniques.

Development and psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire for assessing self-management behaviors in stroke survivors.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and examine the psychometric properties of the Stroke Self-management Behaviors Performance Scale (SSBPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional descriptive correlational study. An 11-item SSBPS was developed. Its content validity was reviewed by an expert panel, and it was piloted among six stroke survivors. Participants completed the SSBPS and four additional measures, namely Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale and Reintegration to Normal Living Index, at baseline and the SSBPS again after four weeks. Principal component factor analysis was performed to examine the factor structure. Internal consistency, convergent validity and test-test reliability were evaluated. RESULTS: 128 stroke survivors completed the SSBPS and additional measures. Thirty-four of them completed the SSBPS again after four weeks. A two-factor structure of "Psychosocial management" and "Medical management" consisting of nine items was identified and accounted for 62% of the total variance. The SSBPS had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.65-0.88) and test-retest reliability (Intra-class correlation coefficient=0.57-0.73). The SSBPS total score was significantly correlated with the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire total (r=0.63, p<0.01), Reintegration to Normal Living Index total and subscales (r=0.60-0.69, p<0.01), Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale total and all domains (r=0.19-0.61, p<0.05), and Geriatric Depression Scale total (r=-0.50, p<0.01) scores. CONCLUSIONS: The desirable psychometric properties of the SSBPS provide evidence that the scale may be reliable and valid for assessing stroke survivors' performance of self-management behaviors. It would inform the development of effective strategies to promote positive self-management behavioral performance for optimal recovery.

Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Variables and Predictors.

Guided by the Self and Family-Management framework, relationships between diabetes distress, self-efficacy, resilience and outcomes of A1c, quality of life and health status were explored. A cross-sectional descriptive design was used. Seventy eight individuals were enrolled from US clinics. Data were analyzed to test for associations, main effects and interactions and predictors of self-management. Results indicated low diabetes distress (M = 20.53), high self-efficacy (M = 7.32), moderate resilience (M = 80.27), and mean A1c 7.35%/56.88 mmol/mol. Seventy six percent of participants scored above the mental health norm, and 46% scored above the physical health norm. The average weighted quality of life score was -1.74. Diabetes distress was negatively associated with self-efficacy, resilience, physical health, mental health, and quality of life. Self-efficacy was positively associated with resilience, physical health, and quality of life. Resilience was positively associated with physical health, mental health and quality of life. Positive associations were found between quality of life, and physical and mental health. No associations were found between A1c and variables in the study. Multiple significant interactions were found with A1c, mental health and quality of life outcomes. Terms in the model included treatment regimen, years since diagnosis, provider collaboration, and history of diabetes self-management education. Distress was a significant predictor of health status and quality of life. The results confirm self-management facilitators self-efficacy and resilience and barrier diabetes distress and their relationships with outcomes in the framework. This study contributes to the understanding of the emotional aspect of diabetes. Continuing this work will allow researchers to better understand self-management, support self-management efforts and better outcomes.

A community-targeted implementation of self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events (SMART): A research and community partnership to reduce epilepsy burden.

AIMS: Self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events (SMART) is a behavioral intervention that has been demonstrated to reduce epilepsy-related complications and improve physical and mental health functioning among people with epilepsy (PWE) [1]. The Community-SMART (C-SMART) initiative was a 4-month prospective implementation of feasibility and pre/post outcomes of SMART in a community setting and in collaboration with key epilepsy service stakeholders. METHODS: Self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events is a group-format, entirely virtual intervention delivered in eight 60-90 sessions over the course of 8-10 weeks. The C-SMART initiative used research staff to guide intervention performance evaluation and staff of a regional epilepsy advocacy agency to assist with community engagement. Process evaluations included outreach and engagement efforts needed to reach PWE, the barriers and facilitators to roll-out, and participant retention and satisfaction. Outcomes included depressive symptoms and epilepsy self-management competency. RESULTS: Thirty individuals were enrolled in 3 "cohorts" of approximately 10 PWE per cohort. Mean age of participants was 48.50 (standard deviation 16.15) years, 60% were female and 53.3% were African-American. Individuals had epilepsy, on average, for over 2 decades, were on approximately 2 prescribed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and had an average of just over 6 seizures in the last 30 days. Over 63% had a comorbid mental health condition. There were 23 individuals (76.7%) who were retained at the 4-month follow-up. Baseline to 4-month outcomes for depression and epilepsy self-management were significantly improved. Most (90%) of participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the program. CONCLUSIONS: The SMART epilepsy self-management program can be successfully implemented in partnership with epilepsy-focused community partners, is acceptable to participants and associated with improved outcomes. Future work might consider how to make virtual epilepsy self-management available to the full spectrum of PWE.